ArticleJMIR infodemiology2026
Quality, Reliability, and Dissemination of In Vitro Fertilization-Related Videos on Chinese Social Media: Cross-Sectional Analysis of 300 Short Videos.
Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: Quality, Reliability, and Dissemination of In Vitro Fertilization-Related Videos on Chinese Social Media: Cross-Sectional Analysis of 300 Short Videos.JMIR infodemiology · 2026Article
- Content Quality, Reliability, and Factors Associated With Likes of Venous Thromboembolism-Related Short Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A Cross-Platform Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients increasingly rely on short-video platforms for information regarding in vitro fertilization (IVF), yet the relationship between the scientific quality of this content and its algorithmic dissemination remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to assess the quality, reliability, and key drivers of dissemination of IVF-related short videos on major Chinese social media platforms. Methods: A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted on 300 popular IVF-related videos (the top 100 results from each platform) retrieved from Douyin, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu between January 10 and 15, 2025. Video quality and reliability were evaluated using the Global Quality Score and a modified DISCERN instrument. Predictors of video dissemination were identified using an Extreme Gradient Boosting machine learning model, with the number of "likes" serving as the primary outcome variable. Results: Content produced by medical professionals demonstrated significantly higher quality and reliability (median mDISCERN 11.0, IQR 9.0-15.0) compared to non-medical sources (median mDISCERN 8.0, IQR 5.0-13.0; P< .001). However, the Extreme Gradient Boosting analysis identified the uploader's follower count as the most powerful predictor of video "likes." In contrast, quality metrics (Global Quality Score and modified DISCERN scores) had a negligible impact on dissemination. Conclusions: In the current Chinese social media landscape, the dissemination of IVF-related videos is strongly associated with creator influence rather than scientific merit. This disconnect between engagement and quality poses a potential risk of misinformation, highlighting the need for medical professionals to adopt platform-native communication strategies to ensure that high-quality information reaches patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.