ArticlePloS one2026
Research on the thermal performance of wall insulation materials and their impact on energy consumption in nearly zero-energy buildings.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the thermal performance of wall insulation materials and their impact on the energy consumption of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEBs) in the hot summer and cold winter climate zone of central and southern Anhui Province, China. A bidirectional environmental chamber was constructed at university to evaluate two graphite-enhanced insulation materials-graphite extruded polystyrene (XPS, extruded polystyrene board; GXPS, graphite extruded polystyrene board) and graphite expanded polystyrene (SEPS, graphite molded polystyrene board)-under simulated seasonal temperature and humidity conditions. Experimental results show that GXPS exhibits superior thermal insulation performance during winter and transitional seasons, with a thermal conductivity as low as 0.023 W/(m⋅K) and stable surface heat flux under large temperature differentials. In contrast, SEPS performs notably well in hot and humid summer conditions, featuring uniform internal temperature distribution and pronounced thermal inertia, which effectively delays heat transfer. Dynamic thermal response analysis reveals that GXPS has a fast cooling response suited for winter, while SEPS demonstrates delayed heating behavior that mitigates summer heat stress. Building energy simulation results indicate that a GXPS insulation thickness of 50 mm achieves optimal energy savings in the region, with annual energy reduction rates between 13.6% and 22.0%. The complementary thermal properties of GXPS and SEPS provide a promising envelope design strategy for regional NZEBs, contributing to energy efficiency improvement and supporting China's carbon neutrality targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.