Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41604413›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

When nonstandard meets standard: Language and affective dynamics in accent-diverse group interactions.

Merrisa Lin, Nairán Ramírez-Esparza, Alexandra Paxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Merrisa LinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6399-778X
Nairán Ramírez-EsparzaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.
Alexandra PaxtonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8603-015X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on communication accommodation theory, this exploratory research examines how the arrival of a standard-accented newcomer influences nonstandard-accented participants' linguistic patterns and positive affect during group interactions. While prior work often focuses on how newcomers adapt to groups, less is known about how a newcomer shifts existing group dynamics-especially in accent-diverse contexts. Across 49 WebEx group discussions involving 102 nonstandard-accented participants, a standard-accented confederate newcomer joined midway through each session. Study 1 examined changes in participants' linguistic patterns, including linguistic style matching, speech mistakes, filler words, clout, and authenticity. Results showed that participants generally diverged from each other and converged toward the newcomer in linguistic style. They also made more speech mistakes, exhibited higher clout, and reduced authenticity, although they used fewer filler words-suggesting a disruption to existing interaction dynamics. Study 2 explored whether participants' positive affect predicted perceived interaction quality after the newcomer's arrival. Positive affect more strongly predicted perceived interaction quality than negative affect-suggesting that participants view the newcomer as more facilitative than disruptive. These findings highlight a complex dynamic of communication adaptation in accent-diverse interactions, where linguistic shifts are disrupted even as affect remains more positive. Implications for group integration and second-language training are discussed.

Indexed as

AffectLanguageAdultCommunicationFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansLinguisticsMaleSocial GroupSpeechYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41604413
PMCPMC12851482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.