ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Fractional CO₂ Laser (SCAR3 Scanner) for a Hypertrophic Retracting Cleft Lip Scar: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scars, particularly those that are hypertrophic and retracting, are a major difficulty in dermatological and plastic surgery. Laser therapy offers a versatile approach to managing hypertrophic lip scars, addressing aspects of scar tissue, such as vascularity and collagen. CASE REPORT This case report describes a 43-year-old woman treated for a hypertrophic, retracting lip scar using fractional CO₂ laser (10 W, 1500 µs dwell time, D-pulse, 500 µm spacing, stack 1, double pass). Two sessions, 56 days apart, led to marked aesthetic and psychosocial improvement without complications. Post-treatment care included 7 days of antibiotic ointment, followed by sun protection and nightly silicone gel. Images were captured before and after the second treatment. During the procedure, the patient reported a perceived pain level of 3 on a scale of 1 to 5, indicating a moderate and tolerable level of discomfort. The Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) chart indicated an overall improvement in scar characteristics, especially in pliability, vascularity, and pigmentation, with minimal changes in height; pain and pruritus levels remained unchanged from before the therapy. After treatments, the patient expressed extreme satisfaction with the results achieved. She reported being "extremely content and satisfied" with the improvement in her scar after laser treatment. No significant adverse effects were observed. The estimated reduced daily activity time was approximately 1 week after each session, with normal activities resumed shortly thereafter. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the potential of CO₂ laser treatment in managing a complex hypertrophic and retracting scar, leading to notable esthetic improvement and a positive impact on the patient's emotional well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.