Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41604344›Full record

ArticleThe Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association2026

Evaluation of Orbitomalar Region Projection İn Patients With Operated Cleft Lip and Palate Part 2: Effect of Maxillary Position.

Gülce Tosun, Alihan Özdemir, Ayşe Gülşen, Mert Doruk, Serhat Şibar, Neslihan Üçüncü

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gülce TosunDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7233-2109
Alihan ÖzdemirDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Ayşe GülşenDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Mert DorukDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Serhat ŞibarDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Neslihan ÜçüncüDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of maxillary position on orbitomalar and suborbital projection by comparing patients with and without cleft with normal and retrusive maxilla, and to determine whether projection loss is primarily related to cleft pathology or maxillary retrusion.DesignRetrospective comparative cephalometric study.SettingSingle tertiary orthodontic center; records from 2010 to 2015.PatientsA total of 142 patients (74 with cleft, 68 without cleft) aged 7 to 13 years, meeting defined inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to cleft status and maxillary AP position determined by SNA: retrusive maxilla with cleft (RCMx,

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateMaxillaOrbitAdolescentCephalometryChildFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective Studiescephalometrycleft lip and palatecraniofacial morphologymaxilla

Identifiers

PMID41604344
PMCPMC13542387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.