Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41604305›Full record

GuidelineJNCI cancer spectrum2026

Pregnancy, cancer, and radiation-a modern refresher.

Kelly Kisling, Sandra M Meyers, Rebecca Milman, Susan Richardson, Christina Chapman, Justine Dupere, Grace Eliason, Suzanne Evans, Titania Juang, Young Lee and 7 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kelly KislingDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0313-6558
Sandra M MeyersMedical Physics Department, BC Cancer-Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0159-9110
Rebecca MilmanDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7629-1444
Susan RichardsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Christina ChapmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-5398
Justine DupereRadiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3104-9029
Grace EliasonDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Suzanne EvansTherapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-6038
Titania JuangDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3307-7050
Young LeeLinac and Software Solutions, Elekta, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-1881
Jeffrey MastenRadiation Oncology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Julia MauesGuiding Researchers and Advocates to Scientific Partnerships (GRASP), Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4478-6952
Rachel NewmanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1472-677X
Mike SiloskyDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-5387
Catherine SongDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Catheryn YasharDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Sara ThrowerDepartment of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9915-7443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer occurs in ∼1 per 1000 pregnancies; thousands of patients may require radiation procedures for diagnosis and treatment each year in the United States alone. This rare but high-risk scenario, coupled with fear of radiation, has created ambiguity in the ideal management of pregnant patients. Without a comprehensive guide for the use of radiation in imaging and treatment for pregnant cancer patients, it is difficult for providers to offer optimal patient-centered care without introducing disparities. The goal of this paper is to provide guidance on the use of radiation for screening, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of cancer, while highlighting gaps in existing knowledge and guidelines. The intention is that physicians, medical physicists, and patients could use this document as a resource for shared decision-making, ensuring safe and effective practice. A team of physicians and medical physicists with expertise in imaging, radiotherapy, and maternal fetal medicine was assembled, along with a patient advocate and lawyer. Existing guidelines and recent literature were reviewed. Authors also drew from their experience where published guidance was lacking. The resulting document discusses best practice to guide use of radiation for cancer, as well as patient-centered care management and legal considerations. Overall, it is possible to safely and effectively deliver radiation to pregnant patients in numerous circumstances. Use of radiation or other modalities should be discussed through shared decision-making with the physician and patient, contextualizing the maternal and fetal risk from treatments. Healthcare providers should support wide access to reproductive healthcare to allow equitable, evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPregnancy Complications, NeoplasticDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingPatient-Centered CarePregnancyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID41604305
PMCPMC13019141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.