Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41604278›Full record

ReviewCancer2026

Minimal residual disease in solid tumors: Clinical applications and future directions.

Theresa Abdo, Ahmad Alhalabi, Sacha Yaghi, Mohammad Aloran, You Li, María Herrán, Rami Tfayli, Thomas A Samuel, Zeina Nahleh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Theresa AbdoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Cleveland Clinic Florida, Maroone Cancer Center, Weston, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0703-1319
Ahmad AlhalabiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Cleveland Clinic Florida, Maroone Cancer Center, Weston, Florida, USA.
Sacha YaghiFaculty of Medicine American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohammad AloranFaculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8365-787X
You LiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Cleveland Clinic Florida, Maroone Cancer Center, Weston, Florida, USA.
María HerránDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Cleveland Clinic Florida, Maroone Cancer Center, Weston, Florida, USA.
Rami TfayliDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Cleveland Clinic Florida, Maroone Cancer Center, Weston, Florida, USA.
Thomas A SamuelDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Cleveland Clinic Florida, Maroone Cancer Center, Weston, Florida, USA.
Zeina NahlehDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Cleveland Clinic Florida, Maroone Cancer Center, Weston, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2489-1501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to the presence of residual cancer cells or tumor-derived fragments that persist after treatment and remain undetectable by conventional imaging or protein-based assays. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a dynamic biomarker for MRD detection. It enables real-time disease monitoring, prognostication, and often therapeutic decision-making. Two major ctDNA approaches exist, tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic, and they differ in sensitivity, specificity, and clinical feasibility. Recent clinical trials have supported a prognostic and predictive utility of ctDNA MRD in gastrointestinal, lung, breast, and other malignancies, with positive postoperative or post-treatment MRD status correlating with higher recurrence risk and inferior survival outcomes. However, integration into clinical practice remains limited by challenges, including tumor heterogeneity, variable ctDNA shedding across tumor stage, location and timing, lack of standardized assay interpretation, and cost-effectiveness concerns. Emerging technologies such as methylation-based sequencing, ultra-deep next-generation sequencing, and machine learning-driven risk models hold promise for improving detection accuracy and clinical applicability. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to determine the impact of earlier MRD detection and intervention on patient outcomes, potentially supporting the broader adoption of ctDNA MRD. In this article, the authors reviewed the recent clinical applications, limitations and future directions of MRD in solid tumors.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNANeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcancer monitoringcirculating tumor DNAclinical applicationsminimal residual diseaseprognostic and predictive biomarkersolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID41604278
PMCPMC12851408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.