ArticleActa ophthalmologica2026
Comparative efficacy of Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy and surgical iridectomy in modulating perioperative subclinical inflammation after DMEK.
Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the effect of preoperative Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy (PI) and intraoperative surgical iridectomy on subclinical inflammation before and after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), using validated anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) inflammatory biomarkers.
methodsAmong 132 eyes eligible for analysis, this matched cohort study included 40 eyes (20 per group) undergoing DMEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Patients received either a preoperative laser PI or intraoperative surgical iridectomy. Eyes were matched according to gender, age, presence of preoperative posterior stromal ripples, baseline visual acuity and corneal thickness. Pre- and post-operative inflammation was quantified using AS-OCT measured aqueous-to-air relative intensity (ARI) and anterior chamber (AC) cell reflectivity. Post-operative trends in subclinical inflammation were compared using generalized additive models (GAM). Visual, pachymetric and endothelial outcomes, as well as post-operative complications, were compared.
resultsThe laser PI group showed greater baseline ARI (p < 0.001) consistent with higher preoperative subclinical inflammation, while surgical iridectomy eyes exhibited greater cell counts after DMEK and at final follow-up (both p = 0.05). Post-operative inflammatory spikes resolved by 6-8 weeks, with faster normalization and lower peak values in the laser PI group. Visual acuity improvement, central corneal thickness reduction, endothelial cell loss and complication rates were comparable.
conclusionsPreoperative laser PI was associated with lower early post-operative subclinical inflammation compared with intraoperative surgical iridectomy, without compromising visual or endothelial outcomes. These findings suggest that a less invasive PI approach may mitigate early post-operative immune activation, promoting smoother AC homeostasis after DMEK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.