Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41604133›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Investigating category transitions and interresponse times in fluency tasks.

Corey M Magaldino, Eric L Amazeen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Corey M MagaldinoDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. cmagaldi@asu.edu.
Eric L AmazeenDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantic fluency tasks require participants to recall as many items as possible from a category (e.g., animals) within a fixed time. These tasks are known to produce heavy-tailed distributions of interresponse times (IRTs), a pattern also found in natural foraging. The present study examined whether long IRTs arise specifically at category transitions. Across three experiments, participants completed fluency tasks that varied in scope: recalling items from a single semantic category (animals), from two categories (animals and vegetables), or from letter-based categories (words beginning with S or T). IRTs were modeled against normal, lognormal, and power-law distributions, and transitions were identified using both behavioral ratings and algorithmic similarity measures. Results showed that lognormal distributions consistently provided the best fit at group and individual levels, confirming the heavy-tailed nature of memory search. The longest IRTs appeared immediately after, rather than during, a category switch, suggesting a brief adjustment period when participants begin exploring a new cluster of items. These findings support the view that memory retrieval operates according to principles of optimal foraging, highlighting shared dynamics across spatial, semantic, and abstract domains.

Indexed as

Free recallHeavy-tailed distributionsMemory foragingSemantic fluency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.