ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2026
Effect of region of interest settings on diagnostic performance of attenuation imaging in hepatic steatosis.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analytical Validation and Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of Plasma Carboxylesterase 1 for Ultrasound-Defined Hepatic Steatosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAttenuation techniques have been developed to quantify liver fat, improving diagnostic accuracy. However, the standardization of measurement methods remains undefined, limiting clinical application. This study evaluated the effect of different region of interest (ROI) settings on the attenuation coefficient (AC) and coefficient of determination (R
methodsWe analyzed 5212 ultrasound examinations performed at our institution. Two periods were compared: early [ROI positioned at twice the subcutaneous thickness; double positioning (DP), 2 × 3 cm] and late [ROI placed beneath the multireflection layer; color positioning (CP), 2 × 4 cm]. Additionally, AC and R
resultsThe early and late periods included 2881 and 2331 examinations, respectively. Patient characteristics were comparable. Significant differences were observed in the AC (median, 0.58 vs. 0.56 dB/cm/MHz), steatotic liver diagnostic rates based on AC, R
conclusionIn ATI, the larger ROI improved R
Indexed as
Identifiers
41604121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.