ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026
Nanopore sequencing of the Tunisian gut microbiome: effect of the DNA extraction methods.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing technologies have revolutionized the field of microbiome research, offering unprecedented insights into microbial diversity, community structure, and evolution. In this study, we compared three DNA extraction methods including; enzymatic lysis (ELM), commercial kit (CKM) and Phenol/Chloroform (PCAI) for their efficacy in microbiome taxonomy using Nanopore Sequencing. Metagenomic analysis of DNA extracted from stool samples were analyzed to determine the variability in microbial compositions. Our results revealed significant differences in DNA yield, microbial diversity, and community structure among the extraction methods tested. Globally, Phocaeicola_vulgatus, Ruminococcus_bicirculans, Faecalibacterium_prausnitzii, Prevotella copri, and Bacteroides ovatus are the most abundant identified species in all the samples. Further, the results showed that Ruminococcus_bicirculans is the most abundant specie identified in ELM, whereas the richness of Bacteroides_fragilis is higher in PCAI than ELM and CKM-processed samples. Our findings underscore the importance of methods selection in microbiome research and provide insights into optimizing DNA extraction protocols for nanopore sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.