Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41604101›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026

Nanopore sequencing of the Tunisian gut microbiome: effect of the DNA extraction methods.

Ammous-Boukhris Nihel, Abdelmaksoud-Dammak Rania, Oumarou Hama Hamadou, Grine Ghiles, Belguith Imen, Abdelhedi Fatma, Amouri Ali, Mnif Basma, Sellami Hayet, Gdoura Radhouan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ammous-Boukhris NihelCenter of Biotechnology of Sfax, Laboratory of Eukaryotes' Molecular Biotechnology, University of Sfax, Sfax , Tunisia.
Abdelmaksoud-Dammak RaniaCenter of Biotechnology of Sfax, Laboratory of Eukaryotes' Molecular Biotechnology, University of Sfax, Sfax , Tunisia.
Oumarou Hama HamadouIHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Grine GhilesIHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Belguith ImenFaculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax , Tunisia.
Abdelhedi FatmaFaculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax , Tunisia.
Amouri AliFaculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax , Tunisia.
Mnif BasmaFaculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax , Tunisia.
Sellami HayetFaculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax , Tunisia.
Gdoura RadhouanFaculty of Sciences of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Ammar-Keskes LeilaFaculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax , Tunisia.
Raja Mokdad-GargouriCenter of Biotechnology of Sfax, Laboratory of Eukaryotes' Molecular Biotechnology, University of Sfax, Sfax , Tunisia. raja.gargouri@cbs.rnrt.tn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-0061

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 952583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing technologies have revolutionized the field of microbiome research, offering unprecedented insights into microbial diversity, community structure, and evolution. In this study, we compared three DNA extraction methods including; enzymatic lysis (ELM), commercial kit (CKM) and Phenol/Chloroform (PCAI) for their efficacy in microbiome taxonomy using Nanopore Sequencing. Metagenomic analysis of DNA extracted from stool samples were analyzed to determine the variability in microbial compositions. Our results revealed significant differences in DNA yield, microbial diversity, and community structure among the extraction methods tested. Globally, Phocaeicola_vulgatus, Ruminococcus_bicirculans, Faecalibacterium_prausnitzii, Prevotella copri, and Bacteroides ovatus are the most abundant identified species in all the samples. Further, the results showed that Ruminococcus_bicirculans is the most abundant specie identified in ELM, whereas the richness of Bacteroides_fragilis is higher in PCAI than ELM and CKM-processed samples. Our findings underscore the importance of methods selection in microbiome research and provide insights into optimizing DNA extraction protocols for nanopore sequencing.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA, BacterialGastrointestinal MicrobiomeNanopore SequencingFecesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomicsDNA, BacterialComparative analysisDNA extractionHealthy donorsHuman microbiomeMicrobial diversityNanopore next generation sequencingStool samples

Identifiers

PMID41604101
PMCPMC12852554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.