ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Breast cancer risk level and prediction of tumor aggressiveness in the Athena Breast Health Network.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A roadmap to reduce the incidence and mortality of breast cancer by rethinking our approach to women's health.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDetermine the association between the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium v2 model (BCSC) risk score and advanced and non-advanced invasive breast cancer (IBC).
methodsWe estimated BCSC 5-year invasive breast cancer risk for 11,915 participants in a prospective screening cohort with median follow-up of 6.9 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis. Individuals in the top 25% by age of BCSC risk standard were considered high-risk, those in the bottom 75% low-risk. We obtained cancer outcomes, including American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) prognostic pathologic stage, from the San Francisco Mammography Registry and an institutional cancer registry. We examined the associations of BCSC risk scores with advanced (≥ AJCC prognostic stage II) and non-advanced (AJCC prognostic stage I) IBC using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression.
resultsOf 11,915 participants, 4,005 (34%) were high-risk. There were 254 incident IBC cases, of which 40 (16%) were advanced and 214 (84%) were non-advanced. The median 5-year BCSC risk score for women with and without IBC was 1.83% and 1.45%, respectively (p < 0.001). High BCSC risk among women diagnosed with breast cancer was associated with non-advanced cancer (OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.71-2.95, p < 0.0001), but not with advanced cancer (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.63-2.29, p = 0.57) compared to women not diagnosed with breast cancer.
conclusionHigh BCSC risk scores were associated with high rates of non-advanced IBC. As non-advanced cancers are more likely to be hormone receptor-positive, BCSC may optimally identify candidates for endocrine risk reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.