ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Prognostic and Diagnostic Value of Serum Bile Acid Profiles in Pancreatic Cancer: a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBile acids (BAs) are important molecules in the carcinogenesis of pancreatic cancer (PC). The BA profile in pancreatic diseases and its role in PC remain unclear.
methodsThe concentrations of 63 BAs in serum were measured in a total of 421 participants from three medical centers using targeted metabolomics. The concentrations of seven common types of BAs in serum were determined and compared. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm analysis was used to confirm the independent predictors and build a metabolite panel for prediction and discrimination.
resultsA panel of two BA metabolites DCA and ω-MCA showed high diagnostic performance for PC versus healthy controls with an AUC of 0.914 (95% CI 0.873-0.956) in the validation cohort and achieved a 94.20% positive rate in the validation cohort. This diagnostic panel correlated with advanced clinical stage (p = 0.006) and poorer overall survival (HR = 3.11, 95% CI 0.79-12.23, p = 0.006). Importantly, biliary obstruction altered total BA concentrations (2.4-fold increase, p < 0.001) but did not change BA compositional proportions (p > 0.05). Additionally, ω-MCA, GCA-3S, GCDCA-3S, UDCA, and secondary BAs may distinguish PC from pancreatic benign tumors. GLCA was able to differentiate PC from pancreatic premalignant lesions. TLCA, 3-oxoLCA, and NorCA can effectively separate PC from chronic pancreatitis.
conclusionBAs are potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for PC, which may also be helpful in differentiating pancreatic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41603998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.