ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
Computational prioritization of multi-target inhibitors: explainable QSAR and docking-based discovery of dual AChE/BACE1 chemotypes.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tetrapeptide inhibitors of BACE-1 revealed by combined data-driven screening and physics-based free-energy refinement.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discovery of dual acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and β-secretase (BACE1) inhibitors remains a promising strategy against multifactorial Alzheimer's disease. Here, rigorously curated ChEMBL-derived data were used to develop explainable QSAR (Quantitative structure-activity relationship) models for dual-inhibition prioritization. Molecules were standardized, near-duplicates were removed using a Tanimoto similarity threshold (≥ 0.80), and physicochemical outliers were filtered prior to modeling. Multiple classifiers (including Light Gradient-Boosting Machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors and Gradient Boosting Decision Trees) and fingerprints (e.g., RDKit fingerprints, Extended Connectivity Fingerprint) were benchmarked under scaffold-based nested cross-validation to prevent data leakage. Class imbalance was handled with SMOTETomek applied strictly within training folds. Model selection relied on F-Score, Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve, Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and Recall, and performance was accompanied by bootstrap confidence intervals, calibration curves, and Y-randomization controls. In classification, the top model (GBDT + ECFP6) achieved strong generalization (Recall ≈ 1.00, PR-AUC ≈ 0.84, MCC ≈ 0.81, F1 Score ≈ 0.84). Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis highlighted aromatic and hydrogen-bonding substructures as key positive contributors. Prospective candidates (e.g., CHEMBL5082250, CHEMBL1651126, CHEMBL1651127) were evaluated by active-site-focused docking against AChE (PDB: 4EY7) and BACE1 (PDB: 2G94) with essential waters retained; docking scores (ΔG, kcal·mol⁻
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.