ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Unpacking response Inhibition in animals - part 2: an empirical test.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unpacking response inhibition in animals - part 1: a conceptual framework.Animal cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Response inhibition - the ability to suppress or stop actions - is crucial for adaptive behaviour across species. In Part 1 of this study, we presented a conceptual framework for understanding response inhibition as multifaceted. Specifically, we conceptualised response inhibition as a race between a 'go runner' and a 'stop runner'. These runners are modulated by the type of stimulus that triggers the runner, the relative timing between stimuli, and the type of actions that are elicited. In Part 2, the framework is used to make predictions about correlations between different measures of response inhibition across three tasks: the detour barrier task, the thwarting task, and the stop-change task. These predictions were tested in two closely related bird species: herring gulls (Larus argentatus) and lesser black-backed gulls (Larus fuscus). The correlations between specific measures of response inhibition were generally weak. This pattern of results supports the idea that response inhibition is not a unitary ability, but rather a set of partly independent components. These findings highlight the importance of task context and trigger type in shaping inhibitory performance, and they illustrate how conceptual and mathematical models can guide more nuanced interpretations of inhibition across different ecological and experimental settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.