Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41603982›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2026

Unpacking response Inhibition in animals - part 2: an empirical test.

Camille A Troisi, Alizée Vernouillet, Reinoud Allaert, Sophia Knoch, An Martel, Luc Lens, Frederick Verbruggen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camille A TroisiCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. camille.troisi@univ-rennes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4036-3848
Alizée VernouilletCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-2936
Reinoud AllaertCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6122-496X
Sophia KnochCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9156-5725
An MartelCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7609-5649
Luc LensCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0241-2215
Frederick VerbruggenCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7958-0719

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11P3G24NHorizon 2020 Framework Programme 769595HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme 101062662Universiteit Gent 01M00221Universiteit Gent BOF21/PDO/084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response inhibition - the ability to suppress or stop actions - is crucial for adaptive behaviour across species. In Part 1 of this study, we presented a conceptual framework for understanding response inhibition as multifaceted. Specifically, we conceptualised response inhibition as a race between a 'go runner' and a 'stop runner'. These runners are modulated by the type of stimulus that triggers the runner, the relative timing between stimuli, and the type of actions that are elicited. In Part 2, the framework is used to make predictions about correlations between different measures of response inhibition across three tasks: the detour barrier task, the thwarting task, and the stop-change task. These predictions were tested in two closely related bird species: herring gulls (Larus argentatus) and lesser black-backed gulls (Larus fuscus). The correlations between specific measures of response inhibition were generally weak. This pattern of results supports the idea that response inhibition is not a unitary ability, but rather a set of partly independent components. These findings highlight the importance of task context and trigger type in shaping inhibitory performance, and they illustrate how conceptual and mathematical models can guide more nuanced interpretations of inhibition across different ecological and experimental settings.

Indexed as

CharadriiformesInhibition, PsychologicalAnimalsMaleHerring gullsInhibitory controlLesser black-backed gullsResponse inhibitionTask context

Identifiers

PMID41603982
PMCPMC12872641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.