Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41603977›Full record

ReviewPlanta2026

The potential of Pseudomonas spp. as sustainable bioinoculants for enhancing maize growth and integrated management of drought and Fusarium verticillioides stress.

Khethiwe Ndlazi, Siyabonga Ntshalintshali, Lungelo Buthelezi, Ashwil Klein, Marshall Keyster, Mbukeni Nkomo, Arun Gokul

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khethiwe NdlaziDepartment of Agriculture, University of Zululand, Main Road, P/Bag X1001, Kwadlangezwa, 3886, South Africa.
Siyabonga NtshalintshaliPlant Biotechnology Laboratory, School of Science and Agriculture, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, University Road, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
Lungelo ButheleziDepartment of Agriculture, University of Zululand, Main Road, P/Bag X1001, Kwadlangezwa, 3886, South Africa.
Ashwil KleinPlant Omics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, 7530, South Africa.
Marshall KeysterEnvironmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, 7530, South Africa.
Mbukeni NkomoPlant Biotechnology Laboratory, School of Science and Agriculture, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, University Road, Durban, 4000, South Africa. NkomoM@ukzn.ac.za.
Arun GokulSchool of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela, 1200, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-0632

Funding

National Research foundation 107023National Research foundation 115280National Research foundation 116346National Research Foundation (ZA) 129493National Research Foundation (ZA) BAAP2204082813Wellcome Trust 109083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThe review highlights PGPR (e.g., Pseudomonas spp.) as sustainable, low-cost solution to mitigate drought and Fusarium stress in maize, enhancing yield and resilience. Maize (Zea mays L.) is a vital staple crop worldwide, yet its productivity is under growing pressure from the combined effects of drought and Fusarium verticillioides infection. These stresses often occur together, compounding the damage. Drought limits water availability, disrupts nutrient uptake, and slows photosynthesis, while also making plants more vulnerable to disease. In turn, F. verticillioides harms plant tissues, contaminates grain with fumonisins, and can further intensify water stress. Conventional approaches such as irrigation, fungicides, and resistant cultivars often fall short when both stresses occur simultaneously. In recent years, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), particularly Pseudomonas spp., have gained attention as eco-friendly partners in managing these challenges. These beneficial bacteria support maize growth by improving nutrient availability, regulating plant hormones, enhancing osmoprotectants' production, activating antioxidant defenses, and suppressing pathogens through antifungal compounds, competitive root colonization, and induced systemic resistance. Findings from single-stress experiments show that Pseudomonas endophytes can boost drought tolerance by maintaining osmotic balance and antioxidant activity, while also limiting F. verticillioides infection and toxin production. However, studies examining their effectiveness under the combined pressures of drought and fungal attack remain limited. This review brings together current knowledge on the mechanisms, case studies, and practical constraints of Pseudomonas-mediated stress relief in maize, highlighting research gaps and setting priorities for strain selection, microbial consortia design, and large-scale field testing. Harnessing these bacteria could be a key step toward building climate-resilient maize production systems that protect both yields and grain safety in an era of environmental uncertainty.

Indexed as

FusariumPlant DiseasesPseudomonasZea maysDrought ResistanceDroughtsStress, PhysiologicalAdaptation mechanismsFusarium infectionPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteriaSustainable agricultureWater deficitZea mays L.

Identifiers

PMID41603977
PMCPMC12852290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.