ArticleJournal of vision2026
Dissociated temporal and spatial impairments of microsaccade dynamics in homonymous hemianopia following ischemic stroke.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the temporal and spatial components of microsaccade dynamics in homonymous hemianopia (HH) after ischemic stroke, and their association with patients' visual impairments. The eye position data were recorded during visual field testing in 15 patients with HH and 15 controls. Microsaccade rate (temporal) and direction (spatial) dynamics in HH were analyzed across visual field sectors with varying defect depth and compared with controls. Support vector machines were trained to characterize the visual field defects in HH based on microsaccade dynamics. Patients exhibited stronger microsaccadic inhibition in the sighted areas, postponed and stronger microsaccadic inhibition in areas of residual vision (ARVs) compared to controls. Meanwhile, a rebound was evident in the sighted areas but absent in the ARVs and blind areas. Microsaccades surviving the inhibition were more attracted toward the stimulus, whereas microsaccades after the inhibition were directed away from the stimulus in controls. Such pattern was not observed in HH. Dissociated temporal and spatial impairments of microsaccade dynamics suggest multi-fold impairments of the visual and oculomotor networks in HH. Based on the microsaccadic phase signature underlying microsaccade rate dynamics, we characterized patients' visual field defects and discovered regions with residual function inside both the blind and sighted hemifields. These findings suggest that monitoring microsaccade dynamics may provide valuable supplementary information beyond that captured by behavioral responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.