In one paragraphArticle in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
11 authors.
Judit Kosztik *Department of Research and Development, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
Erzsébet Baka *Department of Molecular Ecology, Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-6385-2716 András TáncsicsDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0927-1136 Renáta ÁbrahámDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0002-8954-9085 Gyula SzabóDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.
István NagySeqomics Biotechnology Ltd., Mórahalom, Hungary.
Massimiliano OrsiniLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Genomics, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Italy.
Ildikó Bata-VidácsDepartment of Research and Development, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3019-8030 Helga SzalontaiDepartment of Research and Development, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
József KukolyaDepartment of Research and Development, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
István NagyDepartment of Research and Development, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-1920 Funding
National Research, Development and Innovation Fund EKÖP-24-VI/MATE-3National Research, Development and Innovation Fund ÚNKP-23-3-II-MATE-21National Research, Development and Innovation Office K142686National Research, Development and Innovation Office K146358
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Genome, BacterialHerbicidesRhodococcusZea maysBacterial ProteinsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEvolution, MolecularGene Transfer, HorizontalGenomic IslandsGenomicsPlant RootsProteomicsBacterial ProteinsHerbicidesgenome plasticityherbicide degradationhorizontal gene transferproteomicsRhodococcus erythropolis NI86/21
Identifiers
PMID41603638
PMCPMC12915292
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390