ReviewThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2026
Development of a capability framework for antimicrobial stewardship specialist health professionals working in the NHS in England: utilizing Delphi methodology.
Review in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes are led by multi-professional teams and are central to optimizing antimicrobial use and minimizing inappropriate use. Although frameworks exist that describe the knowledge and skills relating to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and AMS for generalist healthcare professionals, there is a need to provide a framework for AMS specialists working in the NHS that supports the development of flexible capabilities rather than granular competencies.
objectivesTo develop a multi-professional capability framework to recognize and develop the specialist knowledge and skills of AMS staff across all sectors of healthcare, including adult and paediatric services, at all levels of post-foundation specialist practice.
methodsA modified Delphi approach was adopted. Initial capability statements were derived from a literature review. An expert panel of UK-based AMS professionals participated in two Delphi survey rounds to assess the importance of each capability statement and map level of delivery against level of practice. Descriptors of practice and professional development resources were identified through follow-up workshops and consultation.
resultsFrom 922 source statements, 45 capability statements were agreed and structured into four domains: AMS Professional Practice, Leadership and Management, Education, and Research and Quality Improvement. Consensus was reached across all statements following two Delphi rounds. Descriptors of practice and development resources were identified to support benchmarking and professional development across all levels of specialist practice.
conclusionsThis multi-professional capability framework defines AMS specialist practice relevant to all NHS sectors, supporting professional development, career progression, and strategic workforce planning across all professional groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.