ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026
Pollen counting made easy: mobile pollen counter provides real-time results in the field.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-time quantification of pollen release: from liquid suspensions to airborne counting.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding pollen release dynamics is essential for studying plant reproductive strategies, particularly in systems where pollen is aerosolized, such as wind- and buzz-pollinated flowers. Yet quantifying airborne pollen is often labor-intensive and dependent on laboratory-based methods, limiting field research. We demonstrate that a handheld air particle counter can provide rapid, portable, and precise quantification of pollen in real-time across pollination systems. Using controlled vibration experiments on buzz-pollinated Melastomataceae stamens, we compared counts from the handheld device with a conventional liquid particle counter. The handheld counter produced more consistent and realistic estimates, probably due to its ability to capture dispersed pollen clouds regardless of release direction. High-speed video confirmed that traditional methods can miss substantial pollen because of directional variability in complex stamens. We demonstrate that the device is applicable beyond buzz pollination by quantifying the exponential decline in airborne pollen concentration from wind-pollinated Betula anthers with increasing distance. The device also enabled fine-scale characterization of pollen size distributions and real-time release rates. The method proved robust to variations in pollen concentration and particle speed. Beyond pollen, this approach has potential for quantifying airborne particles such as spores, seeds, and pathogens, expanding opportunities for experimental field studies of airborne particle dispersal and plant reproductive evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.