Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41603353›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Executive resources shape the impact of language predictability across the adult lifespan.

Merle Marie Schuckart, Sandra Martin, Sarah Tune, Lea-Maria Schmitt, Gesa Hartwigsen, Jonas Obleser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Merle Marie Schuckart *Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7178-7360
Sandra Martin *Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6687-5278
Sarah TuneDepartment of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-9965
Lea-Maria SchmittDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9356-2234
Gesa Hartwigsen *Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8084-1330
Jonas Obleser *Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7619-0459

Funding

DFG HA 6314/4-2; Research Unit 5429/1 (467143400): HA 6314/10-1DFG OB 352/2-2ERC ERC-2021-COG 101043747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans routinely anticipate upcoming language, but whether such predictions come at a cognitive cost remains debated. In this study, we demonstrate the resource-dependent nature of predictive mechanisms in language comprehension across the lifespan: Experimentally limiting executive resources through a concurrent task reduces the effect of language predictability on reading time. Participants (

Indexed as

ComprehensionExecutive FunctionLanguageAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReadingYoung Adultageingcognitive loadexecutive resourceshumanlanguageneurosciencepredictionreading

Identifiers

PMID41603353
PMCPMC12851580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.