ArticleIntegrative zoology2026
Energy Constraints and Ecological Adaptation Drive Divergent Evolution of Sensory and Cognitive Brain Regions in Bats.
Article in Integrative zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain evolution is influenced by energy constraints and ecological adaptation for bats, but the specific factors driving specialization in sensory versus cognitive brain regions remain poorly understood. By integrating morphological traits, ecological information, and neuroanatomical traits from 145 bat species, we reveal the driving mechanisms of differentiation: sensory regions (auditory nuclei and inferior colliculus) were constrained by body-size allometry, while cognitive regions (neocortex and hippocampus) were directly shaped by ecological selection. Auditory nuclei decrease in size with increasing echolocation peak frequency, suggesting functional specialization through optimized neural efficiency under energy constraints. Ground-foraging behavior drives neocortical expansion to meet the cognitive demands of complex spatial navigation. Similarly, the dietary diversity was linked to hippocampal enlargement, convergent with the adaptive evolution linking hippocampal expansion to spatial memory in birds. The total brain mass shows dual regulation-dietary diversity drives the enlargement, while the higher wing loading associated with aerial foraging suppresses expansion through metabolic constraints. These findings extend the expensive tissue hypothesis by revealing intra-brain energy trade-offs and demonstrate that ecological and behavioral selection serve as the key driver for cognitive brain region evolution. Our study has highlighted the critical need for multi-scale frameworks that integrate developmental constraints, ecological adaptation, and metabolic trade-offs to unravel brain evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.