Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41603102›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026

The Challenge of Time-to-Event Analysis for Multiple Events: A Guided Tour From Time-to-First-Event to Recurrent Time-to-Event Analysis.

Sandra Schmeller, Alexandra Erdmann, Jan Beyersmann, Christiane Angermann, Ann-Kathrin Ozga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandra SchmellerInstitute of Statistics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-6943-1577
Alexandra ErdmannInstitute of Statistics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Jan BeyersmannInstitute of Statistics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3793-4611
Christiane AngermannComprehensive Heart Failure Centre, University and University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin OzgaInstitute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GL0304Competence Network Heart Failure 01GI0205Competence Network Heart Failure 01GI1202AComprehensive Heart Failure Center Würzburg 01EO1004Comprehensive Heart Failure Center Würzburg 01EO1504Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BE4500/4-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft OZ125/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials often compare a treatment to a control group concerning multiple possible combined time-to-event endpoints like hospital-free survival. Thereby, the first endpoint may occur more than once ("recurrent"), whereas the second endpoint is absorbing. Inclusion of all observed events in the analysis can increase the power and provide a more complete picture of the disease but it needs more sophisticated methodology. We give a stepwise guidance on how to extend the simple time-to-first event model to complex multistate methodology, where multiple events are incorporated. We thereby consider non- and semiparametric methods and show how they are related. Special attention is given to the prerequisites of the models, for example, the Markov property, and their interpretation. Due to novel results in non-Markov models, the summary measurements: state occupation probability, mean number of hospitalizations, and average length of stay allow an easy interpretation of a treatment effect in non-Markov models if the censoring is random. Partly conditional transition rates can be estimated instead of hazards. We investigate the difference between partly conditional transition rates and hazards and the impact of the random censoring condition in a simulation study. Furthermore, the simulation study considers the sensitivity of a Markov test. Different estimators are introduced, and their use is explained based on data from the randomized controlled Interdisciplinary Network Heart Failure trial, which investigated the effects of a nurse-coordinated disease management program. The aim is to give an overview of existing methods, present the assumptions, and elaborate on the differences in interpretation.

Indexed as

BiometryClinical Trials as TopicHumansMarkov ChainsModels, StatisticalTime FactorsMarkov assumptionmethod‐comparisonmultistate modelrecurrent events

Identifiers

PMID41603102
PMCPMC12848661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.