ArticleCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine2026
Unbiased Characterization of Atrial Fibrillation Phenotypic Architecture Provides Insight Into Genetic Liability and Clinically Relevant Outcomes.
Article in Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unsupervised Phenotyping of Atrial Fibrillation Using Variational Autoencoders in a Critical Care Cohort: The ATLAS-AF Study.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2026Article
- Interaction between genetic risk and comorbid conditions in endometriosis.HGG advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a common and clinically heterogeneous arrhythmia. Machine learning algorithms can define data-driven disease subtypes in an unbiased fashion, but whether these AF subgroups align with underlying mechanisms, such as polygenic liability to AF or inflammation, and associate with clinical outcomes is unclear.
methodsWe identified individuals with AF in a large biobank linked to electronic health records and genome-wide genotyping. We applied an unsupervised coclustering machine learning algorithm to 35 curated and uncorrelated clinical features to identify distinct phenotypic AF clusters. The clinical inflammatory status of the clusters was defined using measured biomarkers (CRP, ESR, WBC, Neutrophil %, Platelet count, RDW) within 6 months of first AF mention. Polygenic risk scores for AF and for cytokine levels were used to assess the genetic liability of clusters to AF and inflammation, respectively. Clinical outcomes were collected from electronic health records up to the last medical contact.
resultsThe analysis included 23 271 subjects with AF, of which 6023 had available genome-wide genotyping. The machine learning algorithm identified 3 phenotypic clusters that were distinguished by increasing prevalence of comorbidities, particularly renal disease and coronary artery disease. Polygenic liability to AF across clusters was highest in the low comorbidity cluster. Clinically measured inflammatory biomarkers were highest in the high comorbidity cluster. There was no difference between groups in genetically predicted levels of inflammatory biomarkers. Cluster assignment was associated with mortality, stroke, bleeding, and use of cardiac implantable electronic devices after AF diagnosis.
conclusionsPatients within AF subgroups identified by clustering were distinguished by comorbidity burden and associated with risk of clinically important outcomes, polygenic liability to AF, and clinical inflammation, but not with genetically predicted inflammatory cytokine levels. Our study empirically demonstrates the complementary roles of comorbidity and genetic liability as major drivers of AF phenotypic variability using hypothesis-free methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.