Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41603007›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Fu's Subcutaneous Needling treatment for migraine without aura: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Wenqi Guo, Yusha Yang, Jian Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenqi Guo *The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yusha Yang *Clinical Medical College of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jian SunClinical Medical College of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Fu's Subcutaneous Needling (FSN) is a novel acupuncture technique that has demonstrated significant efficacy in pain management. However, its effectiveness in treating migraine without aura (MWoA) has not been systematically validated. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of FSN and its impact on headache frequency and patients' quality of life (QoL) in comparison with guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy (flunarizine hydrochloride). Additionally, this study will assess the influence of FSN on hemodynamic changes in the prefrontal cortex to further elucidate its underlying mechanisms. Methods: This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial involving 44 participants, who are randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to either the FSN group or the medication group. Participants in the FSN group receive FSN treatment twice weekly for 4 weeks, while those in the medication group are administered 5 mg oral flunarizine hydrochloride capsules nightly for the same duration. Both groups are followed up for 3 months post-treatment. The primary outcome is the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs). From baseline after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcome measures including the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQOL) score, headache diary records, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) are also used to validate clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

flunarizine hydrochlorideFu’s Subcutaneous Needlingmigraine without auranear-infrared spectroscopyrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41603007
PMCPMC12832962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.