Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602968›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Development and comparison of machine learning models for predicting moderate-to-severe tinnitus in patients with hearing loss.

Chenguang Zhang, Tao Ran, Yicong Wang, Di Xiao, Yuwen Wang, Ying Zhang, Ying Zhang, Bin Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chenguang Zhang *Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Tao Ran *Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Yicong WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Di XiaoDalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Yuwen WangZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ying ZhangQinghai University, Xining, China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, China.
Bin GuoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Analyze the psychological and clinical factors of clinically significant tinnitus (THI score ≥38) in patients with hearing loss, construct predictive models based on four machine learning (ML) algorithms, and compare the predictive performance of different models. Methods: Patients with hearing loss who visited the Department of Otolaryngology at Qinghai University between August 2024 and May 2025 were enrolled in this study. Clinical data were retrieved from the hospital's electronic medical record system. The study outcome was the occurrence of clinically significant tinnitus. Predictive variables were screened using univariate analysis, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and the Boruta algorithm. Four ML algorithms-logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and support vector machine (SVM)-were applied to construct and validate predictive models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of each model in the validation set was compared using the DeLong test. Additionally, model performance metrics in the validation set were compared to identify the optimal model. Finally, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) algorithm was employed to interpret the best-performing model. Results: Nine key variables-age, hypertension, sleep disorder, anxiety, hearing loss severity, depression, noise exposure history, hearing side, and ototoxic drug use-were retained after LASSO and Boruta feature selection. Among the four ML models, the RF algorithm achieved the best predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.973 in the training set and 0.977 in the validation set, followed by XGBoost (AUC = 0.962 and 0.961, respectively). DeLong tests confirmed that RF significantly outperformed LR and SVM models ( Conclusion: The RF model showed the best performance in predicting clinically significant tinnitus, with hearing loss severity, age, and sleep disorder identified as major predictors. Integrating auditory and psychological factors can improve early risk identification in patients with hearing loss.

Indexed as

hearing lossmachine learningrandom forestsleep disordertinnitus

Identifiers

PMID41602968
PMCPMC12832511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.