ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Epilepsy clinic analytics: leveraging EMR reporting tools to characterize center volume and complexity.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Epilepsy centers connect patients to multidisciplinary provider groups that can coordinate surgical interventions and/or investigational treatments. Automated techniques to cross-sectionally review patient volume and complexity may reveal objective metrics to assign appropriate personnel and resources. Here, we leveraged an electronic medical record (EMR) reporting tool to examine how patient and visit volumes, antiseizure medication (ASM) prescriptions and neuromodulation use evolved over an 11-year epoch at a single level 4 adult epilepsy center in Texas, USA. Methods: Using Epic Workbench Reporting, we acquired the dates of (i) all clinic visits (office or telemedicine), (ii) CPT codes for neuromodulation interrogation/programming, and (iii) prescriptions for all antiseizure or rescue medications from 14 epilepsy providers between 2013 and 2023. We calculated an annual complexity score (CS) for each patient, incorporating visit frequency and the total number of distinct ASMs prescribed. Results: Over this 11-year period, the clinic cared for 5,215 unique patients, approximately 20% of whom were only seen once. Our analysis revealed a gradual doubling of total patients served annually, an increase in ASM polytherapy rates and subtle shifts in overall ASM prescribing patterns. High CS were observed in patients treated with neuromodulation and/or administered liquid ASMs. Average annual CS gradually increased over the study period, and many patients displayed wide CS fluctuations over time. Discussion: Our results validate a simple approach to longitudinally monitor the volume and approximate complexity of patients within an epilepsy center's ambulatory clinic, providing opportunities to equitably assign personnel and resources, identify candidates for epilepsy surgery and/or remote patient monitoring strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.