ArticleDigital health
The added value of an internet-based intervention for treatment of aggression in forensic psychiatric outpatients: A mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: While internet-based interventions have been used for more than 10 years in Dutch forensic psychiatric outpatient care, it is not clear if, why and for whom they work. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the addition of an internet-based intervention to forensic psychiatric outpatient treatment as usual (TAU) resulted in better treatment outcomes in regulatory emotional self-efficacy, treatment readiness and aggression. Methods: A multicentre mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial was used to compare TAU to TAU with the addition of the internet-based intervention 'Dealing with Aggression'. Thirty forensic psychiatric outpatients, treated in four Dutch organizations for aggression regulation problems, were included. Three validated questionnaires were administered at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment and follow-up. Semi-structured interviews with patients and therapists from the experimental condition were conducted to gain in-depth insight into the quantitative results. Results: No differences between groups on the outcome measures were found. Often-mentioned reasons for ineffectiveness were suboptimal integration in treatment and the requirement of cognitive and reflective skills. However, several patients reported having experienced benefits from the intervention, mostly because treatment was repeated, combined with new insights in their behaviour. Conclusions: Although the trial was underpowered due to issues with recruitment, no proof for effectiveness of the internet-based intervention was found. Moreover, mostly highly motivated and relative cognitive skilled patients participated, indicating that internet-based interventions might fit only a select number of patients. New insights into why and for whom internet-based interventions might work were identified, providing points of improvement for intervention design and implementation in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.