Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602945›Full record

ArticleDigital health

The added value of an internet-based intervention for treatment of aggression in forensic psychiatric outpatients: A mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial.

Hanneke Kip, Lisa Klein Haneveld, Iris Ten Klooster, Saskia M Kelders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanneke KipCentre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6661-2128
Lisa Klein HaneveldCentre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5132-7466
Iris Ten KloosterCentre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0508-033X
Saskia M KeldersCentre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-6871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: While internet-based interventions have been used for more than 10 years in Dutch forensic psychiatric outpatient care, it is not clear if, why and for whom they work. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the addition of an internet-based intervention to forensic psychiatric outpatient treatment as usual (TAU) resulted in better treatment outcomes in regulatory emotional self-efficacy, treatment readiness and aggression. Methods: A multicentre mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial was used to compare TAU to TAU with the addition of the internet-based intervention 'Dealing with Aggression'. Thirty forensic psychiatric outpatients, treated in four Dutch organizations for aggression regulation problems, were included. Three validated questionnaires were administered at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment and follow-up. Semi-structured interviews with patients and therapists from the experimental condition were conducted to gain in-depth insight into the quantitative results. Results: No differences between groups on the outcome measures were found. Often-mentioned reasons for ineffectiveness were suboptimal integration in treatment and the requirement of cognitive and reflective skills. However, several patients reported having experienced benefits from the intervention, mostly because treatment was repeated, combined with new insights in their behaviour. Conclusions: Although the trial was underpowered due to issues with recruitment, no proof for effectiveness of the internet-based intervention was found. Moreover, mostly highly motivated and relative cognitive skilled patients participated, indicating that internet-based interventions might fit only a select number of patients. New insights into why and for whom internet-based interventions might work were identified, providing points of improvement for intervention design and implementation in practice.

Indexed as

aggressionDigital healthforensic psychiatryinternet-based interventionsmixed methodspilot RCT

Identifiers

PMID41602945
PMCPMC12833171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.