Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602942›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Digital health interventions as a catalyst for change: A narrative review of the roles of digital health in enhancing well-being and reducing public health and social issues among sex workers.

L Winter Mokhwelepa, G Olivia Sumbane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L Winter MokhwelepaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3380-1318
G Olivia SumbaneSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly recognized for their potential to address public health and social issues. Among sex workers, these interventions have demonstrated promise in areas such as mental health support, harm reduction, and access to healthcare services. Importantly, the social and structural barriers faced by sex workers, including criminalization, stigma, and marginalization, are deeply intertwined with poor health outcomes, and DHIs may offer a means to tackle both simultaneously. However, existing literature often lacks a comprehensive understanding of their broader roles in enhancing overall well-being and addressing systemic challenges faced by this population, such as limited access to digital tools, inadequate integration of DHIs in sex work health services, and the absence of tailored digital strategies for marginalized groups. This review seeks to bridge this gap by examining the diverse applications and impacts of DHIs on the well-being of sex workers and their ability to mitigate public health and social issues. Objective: To review the roles of DHIs in enhancing well-being and reducing public health and social challenges among sex workers, while identifying key opportunities and barriers. Methods: A narrative review methodology was employed. Relevant peer-reviewed articles and gray literature published between 2010 and 2023 were identified through systematic searches of databases including PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. The search used keywords such as "digital health," "sex workers," "public health," "social well-being," and "interventions." Studies were included based on relevance, methodological rigor, and focus on sex workers. Inclusion criteria comprised studies that specifically addressed DHIs targeting sex workers, were published in English, and provided empirical findings or substantial discussions on well-being or public health outcomes. Exclusion criteria included articles that focused solely on general digital health tools without reference to sex workers, opinion pieces without empirical support, and studies outside the stated time frame. Data were charted and thematically analyzed to map trends, opportunities, and gaps. Results: Findings indicated that DHIs play a significant role in reducing systemic barriers that perpetuate poor health outcomes among sex workers. For example, mobile-based mental health platforms provided confidential support that helped overcome stigma and fear of discrimination in traditional healthcare settings. Digital harm reduction tools, such as online peer-education networks, were effective in reducing unsafe practices by addressing the marginalization that often prevents sex workers from accessing mainstream services. Furthermore, DHIs tailored to regions where sex work is criminalized enabled discreet access to sexual and reproductive health services, demonstrating how technology can mitigate the health risks tied to structural inequities. Nonetheless, gaps persist due to limited digital literacy, inadequate infrastructural support, and the absence of sex worker-centered policy frameworks. Conclusion: DHIs are a catalyst for change, addressing critical health and social disparities among sex workers. Recognizing the co-constitution of public health and social challenges enables a more integrated approach to intervention design and policy development. However, to maximize their impact, future efforts should focus on overcoming barriers, fostering inclusivity, and ensuring sustainability. Specific actions should include investing in digital infrastructure tailored to the needs of sex workers, co-developing interventions with community input, training healthcare providers on digital tools and sex worker-specific issues, and creating policies that protect digital privacy and reduce stigma. Policymakers and stakeholders must collaborate to integrate these interventions into broader public health frameworks.

Indexed as

Digital healthinterventionspublic healthsex workerswell-being

Identifiers

PMID41602942
PMCPMC12833185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.