ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Lymphovenous anastomosis: microsurgical innovation and clinical outcomes in breast cancer-related lymphedema care.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time-Dependent Efficacy of Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis in Secondary Lymphedema: A Rabbit Model Study.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has emerged as an important physiologic microsurgical procedure for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) with the goal of restoring lymphatic drainage rather than providing just palliative care for symptoms of swelling. A multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 2024 (N-LVA) found improvements in the Lymph-ICF physical and mental function domains, and decreased use of compression garments, despite modest changes in total quality of life (QoL) and limb volume at 6 months. Meta-analyses have found average reductions of 30%-35% in excess limb size and nearly two fewer cellulitis episodes per year after LVA and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT). As the surgical technology continues to improve (e.g., prophylactic LYMPHA procedures, high-resolution lymphatic imaging, robotic supermicrosurgery) and as LVA becomes more widely adopted within experienced surgical centers, precision surgery will be increasingly considered in lymphedema care. Collectively, these advancements represent a movement toward physiologic reconstruction in lymphedema care and the next initiatives will focus on patient selection and eligibility optimization, state-of-the-art surgical technology optimization, and standardizing outcome measures to achieve sustained improvements in QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.