Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602919›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Chimpanzee locomotor risk-taking points to the importance of parental and alloparental supervision in humans.

Bryce Murray, Laura MacLatchy, Lauren Sarringhaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bryce MurrayDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Laura MacLatchyDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Lauren SarringhausDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is generally considered the life stage with peak risk-taking among humans, though this may be specific to the type of risk. To circumvent the safety constraints that limit experiments of physical risk-taking in humans, we used the natural behavior of wild chimpanzees as a model. All chimpanzees must navigate the same arboreal substrates where falls from the tree canopy are a major cause of trauma, and therefore have clear fitness consequences. Using instances of locomotor free flight as a proxy, we found that height from the ground and sex did not predict physical risk-taking. The latter finding is similar to human and chimpanzee economic risk-taking studies. We found that physical risk-taking correlated with age, peaking in infancy and decreasing gradually thereafter through juvenility and adolescence. We hypothesize that a similar pattern would be exhibited in humans if oversight were relaxed earlier in childhood, as it is among chimpanzees.

Indexed as

developmental psychologyevolutionary anthropologyevolutionary biologyWildlife behaviorzoology

Identifiers

PMID41602919
PMCPMC12834104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.