ArticleiScience2026
Neurocomputational modeling of rule abstraction and memorization during probabilistic stimulus-reward learning.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preferential choice among multi-attribute stimuli commonly involves one of the two learning strategies: rule abstraction and memorization. When stimulus features combine in a systematic, albeit complex way to predict rewarding or punishing outcomes (e.g., a combination of color and shape distinguishes edible from poisonous mushrooms), corresponding learning problems can be solved via rule abstraction. In other problems lacking this systematicity, stimuli have to be memorized individually. Here, we use fMRI, eye-tracking, and cognitive modeling to study how humans deploy these two learning strategies to select between two simultaneously presented objects. We observed differential learning trajectories and fixation patterns, indicating sudden rule discovery and incremental learning, respectively, captured by cognitive modeling. The derived process estimates allowed us to identify overlapping brain networks associated with cognitive control and value-based decision-making. Importantly, our multi-modal data and model-informed analyses link those processes to unique brain regions, revealing the neurocognitive mechanisms of rule abstraction and memorization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.