Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602917›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Neurocomputational modeling of rule abstraction and memorization during probabilistic stimulus-reward learning.

René Schlegelmilch, Alina Dinu, Gina Joue, Jan Gläscher, Tobias Sommer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

René SchlegelmilchDepartment of Psychology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Alina DinuInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Gina JoueInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan GläscherInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias SommerInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preferential choice among multi-attribute stimuli commonly involves one of the two learning strategies: rule abstraction and memorization. When stimulus features combine in a systematic, albeit complex way to predict rewarding or punishing outcomes (e.g., a combination of color and shape distinguishes edible from poisonous mushrooms), corresponding learning problems can be solved via rule abstraction. In other problems lacking this systematicity, stimuli have to be memorized individually. Here, we use fMRI, eye-tracking, and cognitive modeling to study how humans deploy these two learning strategies to select between two simultaneously presented objects. We observed differential learning trajectories and fixation patterns, indicating sudden rule discovery and incremental learning, respectively, captured by cognitive modeling. The derived process estimates allowed us to identify overlapping brain networks associated with cognitive control and value-based decision-making. Importantly, our multi-modal data and model-informed analyses link those processes to unique brain regions, revealing the neurocognitive mechanisms of rule abstraction and memorization.

Indexed as

cognitive neuroscience and psychology

Identifiers

PMID41602917
PMCPMC12834106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.