ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Biplanar EOS screening in children with hereditary multiple osteochondromas: a feasible screening method?
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children with Hereditary Multiple Ostechondromas (HMO) require regular screening to identify gradual dysplasia or osteochondromas that need surgery. EOS biplanar imaging enables interpretation of weight-bearing malalignment with low ionizing radiation exposure. Objective: To determine whether EOS can be used as a screening method for presence of osteochondromas and frontal plane malalignment in the lower extremities in HMO children. Methods: Presence of ostechondromas was determined in the lower extremities in ten children [age: 14.5(10-20) years, six males] using EOS. Also, frontal plane malalignment was registered. Further, patient reported experience measures (PREM) were collected through a questionnaire. EOS findings were compared with conventional whole-leg radiographs. The frontal plane malalignment was determined using standardized measurements for hip, knee and ankle joints. Reproducibility for both modalities was determined through repeated measurements by the same observer. Results: EOS systematically identified significantly more osteochondromas than conventional frontal radiographs in the lower limbs. Measurements of malalignment in the frontal plane showed only a small systematic bias with narrow limits of agreement between the modalities with mean difference -0.86 degrees (95% LOA: -6.36-4.63 degrees). Intra-observer agreement for both modalities was very good (CV Conclusions: EOS biplanar imaging was well-tolerated and seemed to be a feasible alternative to conventional radiographs for screening of children with HMO, offering reduced radiation exposure and the potential to detect more osteochondromas in the lower limbs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.