ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Support for art interventions in children's hospitals and design strategies for alleviating negative emotions.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Issue: Children experience heightened negative emotions during healthcare visits. Art represents an effective non-pharmacological intervention, but its potential remains underutilized in Chinese children's hospitals. Objective: To alleviate children's negative emotions, enhance the artistic quality of hospital spaces, and support the development of humanized, child-friendly medical environments. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed to investigate the spatial environments of two children's hospitals in Shanghai, China. Pediatric patients aged 3-14 years and their parents were studied using on-site surveys, questionnaire investigations, and naturalistic observation. Results: Support for art intervention was reported by 95.89% of children and 97.75% of parents. Existing artworks showed limited effectiveness, with 20.55% of children not noticing them and only 9.59% rating them as highly aesthetic. The blood-drawing and infusion areas elicited the strongest negative emotional responses, whereas the courtyard space was associated with the lowest levels of negative affect. For art preferences and activity demands in the infusion area, 193 valid questionnaires were collected. Analysis identified four Must-be (M) attributes, three One-dimensional (O) attributes, five Attractive (A) attributes, three Indifferent (I) attributes, and one Reverse (R) attribute, with no dubious attributes detected. Conclusion: This study provides empirical support for integrating art into children's hospital environments and proposes targeted art design strategies for pediatric infusion areas. The findings offer practical guidance for improving children's medical experiences and advancing the development of child-friendly healthcare spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.