Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Support for art interventions in children's hospitals and design strategies for alleviating negative emotions.

Lianyu Wang, Dong Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lianyu WangSchool of Fine Arts, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong, China.
Dong ZhengSchool of Arts and Design, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Issue: Children experience heightened negative emotions during healthcare visits. Art represents an effective non-pharmacological intervention, but its potential remains underutilized in Chinese children's hospitals. Objective: To alleviate children's negative emotions, enhance the artistic quality of hospital spaces, and support the development of humanized, child-friendly medical environments. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed to investigate the spatial environments of two children's hospitals in Shanghai, China. Pediatric patients aged 3-14 years and their parents were studied using on-site surveys, questionnaire investigations, and naturalistic observation. Results: Support for art intervention was reported by 95.89% of children and 97.75% of parents. Existing artworks showed limited effectiveness, with 20.55% of children not noticing them and only 9.59% rating them as highly aesthetic. The blood-drawing and infusion areas elicited the strongest negative emotional responses, whereas the courtyard space was associated with the lowest levels of negative affect. For art preferences and activity demands in the infusion area, 193 valid questionnaires were collected. Analysis identified four Must-be (M) attributes, three One-dimensional (O) attributes, five Attractive (A) attributes, three Indifferent (I) attributes, and one Reverse (R) attribute, with no dubious attributes detected. Conclusion: This study provides empirical support for integrating art into children's hospital environments and proposes targeted art design strategies for pediatric infusion areas. The findings offer practical guidance for improving children's medical experiences and advancing the development of child-friendly healthcare spaces.

Indexed as

art interventionchildren's hospitalsemotionshealing needsmedical space design

Identifiers

PMID41602881
PMCPMC12833222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.