ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2025
Abortion providers as human rights defenders: policy priorities for South Africa.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproductive Health Training in 2026 and Beyond: Adapting Abortion Education in a Post-Dobbs Era.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Barriers and Facilitators of Continuous Labor Companion Support in Ethiopia: Qualitative Formative Study on Facility Readiness and Respectful Maternity Care.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
South Africa's Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act (CTOP) protects legal abortion access, yet systemic service delivery barriers persist, limiting care and contributing to preventable maternal morbidity. This policy brief draws on a 2023-2024 mixed-methods study, including a literature review, online survey, focus groups, and in-depth interviews with 33 abortion providers across seven provinces. Findings highlight chronic underinvestment, staffing shortages, unclear conscientious objection guidelines, facility-based stigma, and inadequate managerial support, alongside discrimination against women seeking services. These barriers drive some women toward unsafe alternatives. Despite challenges, providers remain committed, viewing their work as central to reproductive justice and constitutional rights. Addressing gaps requires integrating CTOP into core services, expanding values clarification training, supporting providers, enforcing rights-based guidelines, and engaging communities to ensure safe abortion care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.