Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602858›Full record

ArticleOTO open

Extracapsular Parotidectomy: A Safe Alternative to Partial Superficial Parotidectomy in Properly Selected Patients.

Mazin Merdad, Mohammed Njoom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mazin MerdadDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine King Abdulaziz University Jeddah Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-113X
Mohammed NjoomDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine King Abdulaziz University Jeddah Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) is the surgical option of choice for treating benign tumors in the superficial lobe of the parotid gland. The less invasive extracapsular parotidectomy (ECP) technique was previously described. Our goal was to review our PSP and ECP cases and compare the outcomes and complications between the surgeries. Study Design: Retrospective cohort review. Setting: Tertiary care hospital. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 98 consecutive with benign parotid tumors restricted to the superficial lobe who underwent parotid surgery. The cohort was divided into 2 groups-ECP (41 patients) and PSP (57 patients). The demographics, tumor size and pathology, operative time, postoperative complications and recurrence rates were compared. Results: No significant differences were found between the groups regarding age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and final tumor pathology. Moreover, no significant association was found between the tumor-specific pathology and the surgery type performed. The mean tumor diameter was significantly smaller in the ECP group compared to the PSP group. The operative time was significantly shorter in the ECP group than in the PSP group. Conclusion: ECP is a safe alternative to PSP in properly selective benign parotid tumors. ECP has a significantly shorter operative time. ECP does not increase the risk of complications related to parotid surgery, including facial nerve paralysis.

Indexed as

complicationsextracapsularfacial nerve injuryparotidectomysuperficial

Identifiers

PMID41602858
PMCPMC12833558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.