ArticleOTO open
Extracapsular Parotidectomy: A Safe Alternative to Partial Superficial Parotidectomy in Properly Selected Patients.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) is the surgical option of choice for treating benign tumors in the superficial lobe of the parotid gland. The less invasive extracapsular parotidectomy (ECP) technique was previously described. Our goal was to review our PSP and ECP cases and compare the outcomes and complications between the surgeries. Study Design: Retrospective cohort review. Setting: Tertiary care hospital. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 98 consecutive with benign parotid tumors restricted to the superficial lobe who underwent parotid surgery. The cohort was divided into 2 groups-ECP (41 patients) and PSP (57 patients). The demographics, tumor size and pathology, operative time, postoperative complications and recurrence rates were compared. Results: No significant differences were found between the groups regarding age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and final tumor pathology. Moreover, no significant association was found between the tumor-specific pathology and the surgery type performed. The mean tumor diameter was significantly smaller in the ECP group compared to the PSP group. The operative time was significantly shorter in the ECP group than in the PSP group. Conclusion: ECP is a safe alternative to PSP in properly selective benign parotid tumors. ECP has a significantly shorter operative time. ECP does not increase the risk of complications related to parotid surgery, including facial nerve paralysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.