ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Pilot Study: Precision in Plastic Surgery: Efficacy of Nerve Mapping and Neural Stimulation for Facial Nerve Localization in Permanent Filler Removal.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in neurosurgery: A critical appraisal of established practices, ongoing controversies, and future trajectories.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Erratum: Pilot Study: Precision in Plastic Surgery: Efficacy of Nerve Mapping and Neural Stimulation for Facial Nerve Localization in Permanent Filler Removal-Erratum.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The surgical removal of permanent facial fillers is often complicated by chronic inflammation, tissue distortion, and the risk of facial nerve injury. This pilot case series highlighted the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) to enhance the safety and precision of filler removal procedures. Methods: This single-center pilot case series included patients who underwent permanent facial filler removal using IONM to localize and protect the facial nerve branches. Results: Four female patients (mean age 53 y; range: 48-56 y) underwent surgical removal of permanent facial fillers, with concurrent face lifting and intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. Indications included recurrent infection in 2 (50.0%) patients, chronic inflammation in 1 (25.0%) patient, and facial asymmetry in 1 (25.0%) patient. No patients had preoperative facial nerve deficits. The mean operative time was 4.5 hours, and filler removal was successful in all cases. Facial nerve function was preserved in all patients without any transient or permanent dysfunction. Two patients (50.0%) received adjunctive fat grafting (mean volume 20 mL; range: 16-25 mL). Minor complications occurred in 2 (50.0%) patients and resolved spontaneously in both. All patients (100%) reported improved facial contour and resolution of symptoms. Follow-up ranged from 5 to 12 months, with no recurrence of nodules, inflammation, or occurrence of any nerve dysfunction. Conclusions: This pilot case series showed that surgical removal of permanent facial fillers with IONM proved safe and effective, yielding full nerve preservation, high patient satisfaction, and no major complications. However, this approach needs further study to prove its efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.