Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602846›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Using Machine Learning as a Seroma Risk Assessment Tool in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Sachin R Chinta, Rebecca Lisk, Alay R Shah, Carter J Boyd, Kshipra Hemal, Thomas J Sorenson, Mihye Choi, Eduardo D Rodriguez, Oriana D Cohen, Nolan S Karp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sachin R ChintaFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.
Rebecca LiskFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.
Alay R ShahFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.
Carter J BoydFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.
Kshipra HemalFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.
Thomas J SorensonFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.
Mihye ChoiFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.
Eduardo D RodriguezFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.
Oriana D CohenFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.
Nolan S KarpFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict seroma risk following prepectoral breast reconstruction. Methods: Two methodologies were used to develop machine learning models for predicting seroma formation based on a retrospective review of institutional data with 2-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction. Method 1 used a dataset including all preoperative patient attributes and operative details, whereas method 2 focused only on variables that were statistically significant on univariate logistic regression. Six algorithms were trained in both methods: logistic regression, Naive Bayes, support vector machine, Results: Chart review identified 318 breasts that underwent prepectoral reconstruction, with a seroma rate of 25.58%. Univariate analysis found that body mass index, mastectomy specimen weight, hypertension, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and skin-sparing mastectomy were positively associated with seroma. Method 1 identified the decision tree to have the highest accuracy (0.81) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.81). Method 2 improved model performance. The random forest achieved the best results, with an accuracy of 0.81 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83. A web application was then created using the random forest model to provide real-time seroma risk predictions. Conclusions: Machine learning models offer a valuable tool for improving clinical decision-making by accurately predicting patient-specific seroma risk in breast reconstruction. Our models outperformed traditional methods in identifying high-risk patients, allowing for tailored surgical techniques and intensified follow-up care.

Identifiers

PMID41602846
PMCPMC12834434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.