ArticleNeurophotonics2026
Neurocognitive mechanisms of mathematics vocabulary processing in L1 and L2 in South African first graders: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: To learn mathematics, young children require accurate interpretations of mathematics vocabulary. When school language differs from children's home language, mathematics performance often decreases. Little is known about cortical activation during mathematics vocabulary processing in different languages. Although behavioral data highlight a difference in L1 and L2 mathematics learning, neuroimaging insights will help us to better understand how and why there is a difference in children's mathematical learning in multilingual societies. Aim and Approach: We investigated behavioral and brain responses (fNIRS) of 42 isiZulu and Sesotho (L1) first graders (6.75 to 7.83 years, 22 girls) who learn mathematics in English (L2) at school when they encounter mathematics vocabulary in L2 compared with L1 and mathematics vocabulary compared with object recognition in L1. Results: The results show that higher accuracy in the L1 mathematics vocabulary, as compared with the L2 mathematics vocabulary, comes with the costs of higher cognitive demands in the right superior and middle frontal gyri for first graders. Mathematics vocabulary required longer response time than object recognition and a higher activation in the right superior frontal gyrus. No parietal difference was observed between conditions. Conclusions: Neuroimaging revealed that children engaged additional frontoparietal regions when processing L1 mathematics vocabulary-patterns not detectable through behavioral measures alone. Increased frontal activation suggests that the interpretation of mathematics vocabulary in L2 is not yet automatized. This study demonstrates how educational neuroimaging refines interpretations of behavioral outcomes within multilingual contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.