ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Real-world database evaluation of drug-associated vitreous opacities and machine learning for clinical interpretability.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With visual disturbances from vitreous opacities (VOs) and floaters drawing increasing attention, we analyzed real-world data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to characterize VO-associated drug profiles and inform clinical strategies for reducing VO-related complications. Materials and methods: Disproportionality analysis was performed on FAERS reports (2004-2024) to identify VO-associated drugs. Drugs were then classified to assess the onset time and baseline characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate confounders. The predictive performance was compared using six machine learning algorithms, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) used for feature importance. Results: Among 3,817 VO-related reports, 38 drugs were identified as independent risk factors, and they were mainly ocular, oncologic, hormonal, antimicrobial, and immunologic agents. Antimicrobial drugs had the earliest onset (mean 43.6 days), and hormonal drugs had the latest (mean 409.2 days). In the bootstrapped aggregating (BAG) model, the top predictors of VO were dexamethasone, reporter, time, brolucizumab, and age. The five highest-risk drugs were dexamethasone, brolucizumab, triamcinolone, faricimab, and fingolimod. Conclusion: This first systematic real-world evaluation of VO-related adverse drug reactions identifies high-risk drugs, susceptible populations, and onset patterns, thus offering guidance for preventive medication strategies. The BAG model showed higher sensitivity in real-world analysis, suggesting potential for further research in VO and floater prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.