Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602828›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Real-world database evaluation of drug-associated vitreous opacities and machine learning for clinical interpretability.

Wenying Guan, Shi-Nan Wu, Ke Feng, Changsheng Xu, Yuwen Liu, Bing Yan, Jingyao Lv, Caihong Huang, Jiaoyue Hu, Zuguo Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wenying Guan *Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Shi-Nan Wu *Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Ke Feng *Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Changsheng XuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yuwen LiuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Bing YanXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jingyao LvXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Caihong HuangXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jiaoyue HuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Zuguo LiuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With visual disturbances from vitreous opacities (VOs) and floaters drawing increasing attention, we analyzed real-world data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to characterize VO-associated drug profiles and inform clinical strategies for reducing VO-related complications. Materials and methods: Disproportionality analysis was performed on FAERS reports (2004-2024) to identify VO-associated drugs. Drugs were then classified to assess the onset time and baseline characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate confounders. The predictive performance was compared using six machine learning algorithms, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) used for feature importance. Results: Among 3,817 VO-related reports, 38 drugs were identified as independent risk factors, and they were mainly ocular, oncologic, hormonal, antimicrobial, and immunologic agents. Antimicrobial drugs had the earliest onset (mean 43.6 days), and hormonal drugs had the latest (mean 409.2 days). In the bootstrapped aggregating (BAG) model, the top predictors of VO were dexamethasone, reporter, time, brolucizumab, and age. The five highest-risk drugs were dexamethasone, brolucizumab, triamcinolone, faricimab, and fingolimod. Conclusion: This first systematic real-world evaluation of VO-related adverse drug reactions identifies high-risk drugs, susceptible populations, and onset patterns, thus offering guidance for preventive medication strategies. The BAG model showed higher sensitivity in real-world analysis, suggesting potential for further research in VO and floater prevention and treatment.

Indexed as

drug-induced riskdrug induction timemachine learningU.S. food and drug administration adverse event reporting systemvitreous opacities

Identifiers

PMID41602828
PMCPMC12833014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.