ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Synergistic muscle coordination of the Paralympic wheelchair tennis champion.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electromyographic analysis of muscle activation and co-activation across smash phases in para-badminton: an exploratory investigation of neuromuscular coordination.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to elucidate specific muscle coordination patterns in a Paralympic gold medal wheelchair tennis player. Recent neuroscience has proposed the concept of the "Paralympic brain", referring to use-dependent and impairment-specific plasticity observed in some Paralympians. Although the present study does not directly assess neural reorganization, this framework provides context for interpreting motor coordination strategies. Methods: We applied muscle synergy analysis of electromyographic (EMG) activities during the tennis serve to quantify muscle coordination in two male players: one a Paralympic and world champion (P1; osteosarcoma with hip and abdominal resections), and the other nationally ranked sub-elite player (P2; spina bifida with paralysis of the lower limbs and trunk). EMGs from 14 muscles and high-speed video were recorded during three flat serves. Results: Serve velocity was markedly higher in P1 (167 ± 11.3 km/h) than P2 (80.0 ± 8.9 km/h). Four synergies were identified in P1 and three in P2. A specific synergy (Syn1), dominant in the early takeback phase and involving lower trapezius and triceps brachii, was found only in P1 and may contribute to greater trunk rotation and serve velocity. In addition, the sparseness of muscle synergies was also higher in P1 than in P2. Discussion: These results indicate that elite serve performance is supported not only by muscular strength but also on specialized neuromuscular coordination strategies optimizing trunk rotation and energy transfer. They may be consistent with broader ideas of use-dependent and impairment-related adaptation described in the "Paralympic brain" framework. This study provides new insights into adapted motor strategies in Paralympic sport, underscoring the role of trunk control and residual function as key factors in training and performance optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.