ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Biomechanical comparison of pin and freeride ski mountaineering bindings in recreational skiers.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although increased equipment weight is known to increase the metabolic cost of uphill skiing at a constant grade, the effects of different binding types on ski mountaineer kinematics across varying grades remains unknown. This study compared lower-body kinematics in recreational skiers between those using pin bindings and those using freeride bindings. Methods: Sixteen participants skied on a treadmill using either pin or freeride bindings mounted to matching skis during 3-min stages at grades of 8% and 15%. Kinematic data were recorded during the final 30 s of each stage. Sagittal-plane joint angles of the lower limbs and torso, along with cycle metrics, were compared across conditions using statistical parametric mapping and linear mixed-effects models. Results: Compared with pin bindings, freeride bindings showed greater ankle plantarflexion ( Discussion: These findings suggest that while biomechanical differences between binding types are statistically significant, their small differences and effect sizes are unlikely to have practical relevance for uphill travel performance in recreational skiers under laboratory settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.