Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602803›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Biomechanical comparison of pin and freeride ski mountaineering bindings in recreational skiers.

Isaac Burgess, Samantha Samuels, Tyler Whittier, John Seifert, James Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isaac BurgessDepartment of Food Systems, Nutrition and Kinesiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Samantha SamuelsDepartment of Food Systems, Nutrition and Kinesiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Tyler WhittierDepartment of Food Systems, Nutrition and Kinesiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
John SeifertDepartment of Food Systems, Nutrition and Kinesiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
James BeckerDepartment of Food Systems, Nutrition and Kinesiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although increased equipment weight is known to increase the metabolic cost of uphill skiing at a constant grade, the effects of different binding types on ski mountaineer kinematics across varying grades remains unknown. This study compared lower-body kinematics in recreational skiers between those using pin bindings and those using freeride bindings. Methods: Sixteen participants skied on a treadmill using either pin or freeride bindings mounted to matching skis during 3-min stages at grades of 8% and 15%. Kinematic data were recorded during the final 30 s of each stage. Sagittal-plane joint angles of the lower limbs and torso, along with cycle metrics, were compared across conditions using statistical parametric mapping and linear mixed-effects models. Results: Compared with pin bindings, freeride bindings showed greater ankle plantarflexion ( Discussion: These findings suggest that while biomechanical differences between binding types are statistically significant, their small differences and effect sizes are unlikely to have practical relevance for uphill travel performance in recreational skiers under laboratory settings.

Indexed as

biomechanicsequipment weightski bindingsskimoski mountaineering

Identifiers

PMID41602803
PMCPMC12832846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.