ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025
Supportive enriched environment improves recovery from persistent motor and cognitive impairments after severe traumatic brain injury.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) causes permanent disability in adults worldwide. While enriched environments (EE) have been shown to improve recovery in the early post-TBI period, their efficacy during the chronic phase of sTBI remains unclear. This study evaluated neurological function recovery in mice with chronic sTBI housed in either traditional EE or supportive EE. Methods: Adult male C57BL mice were subjected to sTBI by controlled cortical impact and maintained in standard environments (SE) for 7 months. sTBI mice were then randomized into SE (TBI-SE), traditional EE (TBI-EE-1), or supportive EE (TBI-EE-2, co-housed with sham mice). Sham controls were housed in SE (Sham-SE) or supportive EE (Sham-EE-2). EE consisted of a large stainless-steel cage with toys replaced three times weekly. Mice remained in these conditions for 10 weeks, and neurobehavioral testing was performed beginning in week 6. Results: In the RotaRod test, TBI-SE mice displayed persistent motor coordination and learning deficits, whereas TBI-EE-2 mice showed robust motor coordination recovery and improved motor learning. Of all TBI mice, only the TBI-EE-2 mice demonstrated improved motor learning. In the Morris water maze test, both TBI-EE-1 and TBI-EE-2 groups showed enhanced spatial learning and memory compared with TBI-SE. Y-maze testing revealed impaired short-term memory in TBI-EE-1 mice but significant improvement in TBI-EE-2 mice. Anxiety-like behavior, assessed by open field and light-dark box tests, was reduced only in the TBI-EE-2 mice. Conclusion: Supportive EE more effectively reduced anxiety and improved motor and cognitive function in chronic sTBI compared with conventional EE. These findings highlight the potential value of incorporating social integration with healthy individuals into rehabilitation programs to optimize recovery in chronic severe TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.