ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Effects of green-wall layouts on psychological and physiological responses in office environments: a virtual-environment study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Office greenery is closely related to employees' physical and mental health. Green walls have been shown to provide biophilic and emotional health benefits; however, previous studies have mostly focused on the presence or absence of green walls or on their coverage area, and have rarely examined how their overall geometric morphology differentially affects users. Methods: In this study, we used virtual reality (VR) to construct four types of office scenarios, namely a curvilinear green wall (CGW), a linear green wall (LGW), a polyline green wall (PGW), and a no green wall condition (NGW), and evaluated their restorative effects after stress induction using MAST. On the psychological level, we adopted the Fatigue Scale FS-14 and the Restoration Outcome Scale ROS; on the physiological level, we recorded EEG data and used β∕α, (α + θ)∕β, θ∕β, and θ∕α to represent arousal, fatigue, attention, and relaxation, respectively, and calculated FAA to reflect motivational states. Results: The results showed that: (1) all three green-wall conditions were significantly superior to NGW in subjective ratings and EEG indicators, indicating that green walls can bring significant health benefits. (2) Regarding green-wall morphology, CGW was the most effective in reducing the fatigue index and reached a medium effect size compared with LGW; it also ranked first in enhancing attention and relaxation, although its differences from LGW did not reach statistical significance. This suggests that the curvilinear morphology further strengthens fatigue recovery while retaining the general advantages of green walls. (3) Compared with the other groups, PGW was overall disadvantaged across the EEG ratios; it only showed a small effect-size difference from CGW on arousal and achieved the highest median value. This indicates that the advantage of PGW lies mainly in enhancing arousal, whereas its other physiological performances do not reach the level of the more typical green-wall conditions. Conclusion: These findings indicate that, although all types of green walls are effective in promoting fatigue recovery compared with the no-green-wall group, their effects are not uniform; green-wall morphology can effectively modulate recovery effects and present differentiated advantages across different dimensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.