SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Postoperative exercise rehabilitation and patient experience among breast cancer survivors under the "Healthy China" initiative: an integrative review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This integrative review synthesizes current evidence on postoperative exercise rehabilitation and patient experiences among breast cancer survivors, aiming to inform the development of scientific, standardized, and contextually appropriate rehabilitation protocols under the "Healthy China" initiative. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across seven Chinese and English databases, identifying 23 eligible studies published between 2015 and 2024, including randomized controlled trials and qualitative research. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The findings revealed substantial heterogeneity in exercise prescription parameters and a lack of unified guidelines. Exercise interventions were generally effective in improving physical function, reducing lymphedema risk, and enhancing psychological well-being, yet patient experiences varied considerably. Adherence was frequently hindered by treatment-related side effects, psychological resistance, and lack of individualized support. Combined interventions integrating multiple exercise modalities showed greater effectiveness than single-mode approaches. This review highlights the need for localized, evidence-based rehabilitation frameworks that consider patient preferences and provide psychological support throughout the recovery process. Nurses and case managers are encouraged to lead interdisciplinary teams in implementing structured exercise programs that include remote monitoring, individualized evaluation, and behavioral counseling to improve patient outcomes and long-term quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.