Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602706›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The double-edged sword effect of empowering leadership on illegitimate tasks: role boundary redefinition and individual differences.

Qin Yang, Zhijun Jin, Jing Shao, Fang Guo, Xujuan Huang, Yin Wenjie, Yu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qin YangDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Zhijun JinDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Jing ShaoDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Fang GuoDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Xujuan HuangDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Yin WenjieDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contemporary organizations, employees often encounter illegitimate tasks, which violate their professional role expectations and undermine their occupational identity. Drawing on role theory and the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, this study investigates how empowering leadership influences perceptions of illegitimate tasks through role boundary redefinition. Analysis of survey data from 354 corporate employees reveals that empowering leadership reduces perceptions of illegitimate tasks by enhancing work passion, while increasing them through elevated role stress. Furthermore, regulatory focus moderates these relationships: promotion focus strengthens the link between empowering leadership and work passion, while prevention focus amplifies the association between empowering leadership and role stress. The study underscores that perceptions of illegitimate tasks are subjective and shaped by the dynamic renegotiation of role boundaries initiated by empowering leadership, with individual differences, particularly regulatory focus, influencing whether employees perceive these tasks as growth opportunities or burdens that exceed their role expectations.

Indexed as

empowering leadershipillegitimate tasksperception of illegitimate tasksrole stresswork passion

Identifiers

PMID41602706
PMCPMC12832405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.