Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Adapting the Short Digital Stress Scale (SDSS) into Turkish: validation and psychometric evaluation in adults.

Ali Geris, Erol Esen, Yağmur Soylu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali GerisDepartment of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Erol EsenDepartment of Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Türkiye.
Yağmur SoyluDepartment of Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to adapt the Short Digital Stress Scale (SDSS) into Turkish and to evaluate its psychometric properties in an adult population. Digital stress has become increasingly relevant with the widespread and continuous use of digital technologies, highlighting the need for valid and reliable instruments across cultural contexts. Methods: A total of 276 adults (72.8% female, 27.2% male; M_age = 27.34, SD = 9.84) completed the SDSS together with established psychological measures, including the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, the Short-Form UCLA Loneliness Scale, the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the original five-factor structure of the SDSS. Convergent and concurrent validity were examined through composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), and correlation analyses. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original five-factor structure-availability stress, approval anxiety, fear of missing out, connection overload, and online vigilance-with good model fit (χ Discussion: The findings demonstrate that the Turkish version of the SDSS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing digital stress among adults. The scale offers a concise and contextually appropriate tool for researchers and practitioners examining the psychological impact of digital engagement in Turkish society.

Indexed as

digital stressmental healthpsychometric propertiesShort Digital Stress ScaleTurkish adaptation

Identifiers

PMID41602702
PMCPMC12832890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.