Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602701›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The relationship between intellectual curiosity and learning engagement in mathematics among adolescents: an analysis of chain multiple mediating effects.

Yongzhao Wang, Lijun Zhou, Bingqing Xie, Lisha Wang, Qiantong Su, Hua Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yongzhao WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Anyang Normal University, Anyang, China.
Lijun ZhouSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Anyang Normal University, Anyang, China.
Bingqing XieSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Anyang Normal University, Anyang, China.
Lisha WangSchool of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, China.
Qiantong SuSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Anyang Normal University, Anyang, China.
Hua JinDepartment of Chinese Language and Literature, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Learning engagement (LE) is a core determinant of academic achievement and educational quality. Methods: Based on PISA 2022 data and focusing on a sample of adolescents in Korea ( Results: The significant correlations were demonstrated of varying strengths among IC, UTS, TTS, ATS, OTS, SB, and LE. Further analysis indicated that IC not only influences LE directly, but also exerts indirect effects through UTS, TTS, ATS, OTS, and SB. Specifically, TS and SB exhibited both multiple parallel and multiple chain mediating effects in the relationship between IC and LE, thereby extending the self-determination theory. Additionally, subgroup analyses revealed that the mechanism exhibited significant and distinct divergence along the gender dimension. For instance, males reported a lower perception of TTS, whereas females' LE is more strongly shaped by the indirect effects of TS and SB. Discussion: These findings elucidate the complex mechanisms how IC affects LE, validate the four-dimensional structure of TS to extend SDT, offer a gender-sensitive intervention perspective for differentiated teaching, as well as provide practical insights for the holistic development of adolescents.

Indexed as

intellectual curiositylearning engagementmultiple mediation modelschool belongingteacher support

Identifiers

PMID41602701
PMCPMC12832674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.