ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Constructing an indicator system for factors influencing volleyball coaches' in-game tactical decision-making: a Delphi study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of the indicator system for factors influencing pre-match tactical decision-making of volleyball coaches.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence and wearable devices in volleyball.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a flow state scale for healthcare professionals.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to construct a systematic and evidence-based framework of indicators for factors influencing volleyball coaches' in-game tactical decision-making. Potential indicators were generated through expert screening and group discussions, then refined via two rounds of Delphi consultation. Indicator weights were determined using the precedence chart method. The final framework comprised six primary indicators-Athlete Competitive Performance (0.3056), Coach Competence and On-site Performance (0.2500), Match Situation and Dynamics (0.1944), Information Support (0.1389), Officiating Performance (0.0566), and Spectator Behavior and Unexpected Incidents (0.0566)-along with 15 secondary and 52 tertiary indicators. Athlete Competitive Performance carried the greatest weight, while Officiating Performance and Spectator Behavior showed the lowest. At the secondary level, Coach Competence, Team Coordination, and both Own and Opponent Athlete Performance were the most influential factors. At the tertiary level, the Individual Technical and Tactical Performance of Own Players was most critical, followed by tactical execution, lineup strength, coaches' authority, and opponent tactical adjustments. Overall, the study highlights the complexity of in-game tactical decision-making and provides a structured indicator framework that offers theoretical insights and practical guidance for improving rational and adaptive coaching decisions in competitive volleyball.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.