ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Augmented reality and embodied learning: effects of embodiment degrees on students' learning achievement, cognitive load, and technology acceptance.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cognitive load, extended reality, and visuospatial abilities in physical science education: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Embodiment in augmented reality has attracted increasing attention in educational research. This study investigated how the degree of embodied experience in augmented reality affects high school students' learning achievement, cognitive load, and technology acceptance. Methods: Drawing on embodied cognition and the Cone of Experience, augmented reality learning tasks were designed with different degrees of embodied experience and implemented in biology instruction on cell structure. A total of 122 Chinese high school students participated and were assigned to either low- or high-embodiment augmented reality experiences. Data were analyzed using analyses of covariance, with learners' prior knowledge scores entered as a covariate to control for pre-existing differences in knowledge level. Results: Students who engaged in high-embodiment augmented reality achieved better learning performance in both knowledge retention and transfer, and they also reported significantly lower cognitive load. In terms of technology acceptance, high-embodiment augmented reality enhanced perceived usefulness, while low-embodiment augmented reality was associated with higher perceived ease of use. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that the degree of embodiment in augmented reality experiences differentially influences learning achievement, cognitive load, and technology acceptance, offering empirical evidence and practical guidance for optimizing embodied augmented reality design in education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.